by Geoff Staples
As freedom-loving Americans, we cannot support anyone who supports state or national Repugnant Party platforms. Repugnant candidate for the Louisiana House of Representatives Chris Tidmore is a good example. He has been endorsed by some who are opposed to the content of the Louisiana Repugnant Party platform due to his claimed issue positions. Unfortunately, the Louisiana Repugnant Party Platform states twice – once at the beginning and again at the end that, “Membership in the Repugnant Party of Louisiana is open to all citizens residing in our state who share the values and beliefs expressed in this document.”
It is irresponsible, naive, dangerous, and ignorant of Repugnant tactics to assume that a Repugnant who makes reasonable issue statements will implement those policies. Repugnants practice the big lie. They tell us what we want to hear and then implement their right wing agenda once elected. This is a technique used by Josef Goebbels in Nazi Germany, Ronald Reagan, and perfected by Karl Rove.
Unless Tidmore and other “reasonable sounding” Repugnant candidates and elected officials publicly and repeatedly denounce the national and state Repugnant Party platforms, we believe their propaganda at our own peril. Tidnore and his Repugnant Party ilk cannot and should not be believed when they pretend to be decent and reasonable people.
While not as hateful and anti-American as the Texas Repugnant Party Platform, the 2004 Louisiana Repugnant Party Platform is nevertheless a declaration of war on those that do not agree with the Repugnant Party lifestyle exhibited by Senator Larry Craig, Senator David “Diapers” Vitter, and Joey “Bathroom Sex” Di Fatta – who are poster boys for the big lie. Their platform claims the Repugnant Party is open to all — but only if one agrees with the Repugnant platform.
This platform is much more cleverly written than the Texas Repugnant Party Platform. For example, it opposes stem-cell research without mentioning the words “Stem-cell” and it opposes global warming as pseudo-science without actually mentioning global-warming. Additionally, cleverly supports religious freedoms that already exist and are opposed by none to create the false impression that these freedoms do not currently exist. They endorse taxpayer funding of private schools without directly saying so and they claim to support health care for all while opposing the reforms necessary to achieve it. Karl Rove would be proud.
more »

