From the Chicago Tribune
For Ann and Bill Duvall, Nov. 3 brought great disappointment--and a call to action.
"We woke up that morning just really devastated and depressed, and
in some ways I'm grateful that we came up with this idea because that's
where we've been able to put our energy," Ann Duvall, 56, said.
Their idea spawned a Web site called Choose the Blue which provides information
about which companies' employees give to Democrats and which prefer
Republicans.
Using information from the Federal
Election Commission Web site and the Center for Responsive Politics
site, www.opensecrets.org, the Duvalls give their fellow Democrats a
gift that could keep on giving.
"If each American who voted for John Kerry spends $100 in 2005 on
a blue company instead of a red company, we can move $5 billion away
from Republican companies and add $5 billion to the income of companies
who donate to Democrats," they say on the site.
At its peak, the site received more
than 300,000 hits in one day, said Ann Duvall, a mother of three and
grandmother of four. Typically between 100,000 and 200,000 sets of eyes
peruse it daily.
"This is not a boycott," said Bill Duvall, a software creator who
was involved in the transmission of the first e-mail message 35 years
ago. "... It's just that we believe it's possible to direct some of
your spending so we can begin to at least even the playing field."
Choose the Blue breaks down its information into categories such
as automotive, consumer electronics, retail shopping and fashion, and
sports. The site's tallies also include gifts from companies to
political action committees. The figures for the companies and their
employees show the total percentages and dollar amounts given to
Republican and Democratic candidates or causes.
Blue Voters Now Urged to Buy Blue
Comments
Re: Blue Voters Now Urged to Buy Blue
by
JayHawk
on Wed 15 Dec 2004 12:35 PM CST | Profile | Permanent Link
if only they would get "blue" every now and then...
Re: Blue Voters Now Urged to Buy Blue
by
shell5960s
on Sun 19 Dec 2004 01:16 AM CST | Profile | Permanent Link
Who is THEY? Sorry, but if the GOPers will make your life better, you wouldn't be in HERE so much! Go to Europe, China, desert countries, etc. -- TRAVEL! It kills me how so many right-wingers live on websites and are ... Republicans! hahahaha Can't you find anything BETTER to spend all that money on than what we common people do?
Fools! Re: Re: Blue Voters Now Urged to Buy Blue
by
JayHawk
on Mon 20 Dec 2004 07:51 AM CST | Profile | Permanent Link
Sorry Shell, my comment was too short and without further explanation. "Getting Blue" is a rough translation from the German "Blau werden" which is a term usually, actually always used in referring to someone getting intoxicated. Intoxicated Bible-thumpers would be a sight to see. As for your suggestion I "travel the world"....I've been a few places you probably wouldn't choose to go to and then some. I live and work in Germany. So put your guns away willya please. No need for us to start shooting at each other cause we're on the same side. Oky Doky ?
Re: Re: Re: Blue Voters Now Urged to Buy Blue
by
Geoff Staples
on Mon 20 Dec 2004 10:09 PM CST | Profile | Permanent Link
Well, Jayhawk:
It would be a site to see. But, it would also be scary as Hell. They all have guns and they're all angry and judgmental. They'd start shooting each other and running everyone over with their pickup trucks. On second, thought, let's take up a collection to send 100 proof schnapps by the truckload to red states. Re: Re: Re: Blue Voters Now Urged to Buy Blue
by
JayHawk
on Tue 21 Dec 2004 02:46 AM CST | Profile | Permanent Link
On second thought, not even a big swig of everclear would help the other side see more clearly. Geoff's right in as much as it could be very dangerous. An alternative state of mind induced by intoxication doesn't always produce positive effects.
"The effects of alcohol intoxication are greatly influenced by individual variations among users. Some users may become intoxicated at a much lower Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC) level than is shown." * 0.02-0.03 BAC: No loss of coordination, slight euphoria and loss of shyness. Depressant effects are not apparent. * 0.04-0.06 BAC: Feeling of well-being, relaxation, lower inhibitions, sensation of warmth. Euphoria. Some minor impairment of reasoning and memory(classical syptoms for many Reds), lowering of caution. * 0.07-0.09 BAC: Slight impairment of balance, speech, vision, reaction time(my Pet Goat), and hearing. Euphoria. Judgement and self- control are reduced, and caution, reason and memory are impaired. * 0.10-0.125 BAC: Significant impairment of motor coordination and loss of good judgement(good judgement ? Which Red fool has this while sober ?). Speech may be slurred; balance, vision, reaction time and hearing will be impaired. Euphoria. It is illegal to operate a motor vehicle at this level of intoxication (let alone run a country). * 0.13-0.15 BAC: Gross motor impairment and lack of physical control. Blurred vision and major loss of balance. Euphoria is reduced and dysphoria is beginning to appear. * 0.16-0.20 BAC: Dysphoria (anxiety, restlessness) predominates, nausea may appear. The drinker has the appearance of a "sloppy drunk." * 0.25 BAC: Needs assistance in walking(and talking...... in Dubya's case); total mental confusion(Dubya again). Dysphoria with nausea and some vomiting. * 0.30 BAC: Loss of consciousness (hell, most reds aren't even 100% conscious while sober!) * 0.40 BAC and up: Onset of coma, possible death due to respiratory arrest (one way to minimize the number of reds). As I see it, these people(Bu$hCo supporters okay?) should never touch the everclear as they already have many of the symotoms of drunkeness without even having glanced at the bottle let alone having pulled the cork. The only thing that will bring them 'round is the sobering reality which is so effectively being kept from them by the corporate-muffled and manipulated press. The truth is a jagged pill not easily swallowed. Hope for the brainwashed comes somewhere beyond the 0.40 BAC mark or perhaps with the impact and detination of the first CONUS A-Bomb (CONUS is milspeak for Continental US). Cheers ! Re: Blue Voters Now Urged to Buy Blue
by
clarence
on Thu 23 Dec 2004 12:35 AM CST | Profile | Permanent Link
Back to the topic of where we spend our money:
Think globally, shop locally. Spend a few extra pennies getting what you need (want) from the mom&pop store, even if they're Hoover Repugs. Give them solid evidence that you're behind them. They're struggling too and if you make clear to them that WE locals gotta stick together you can start depolarizing issues. You're no longer one of THEM but one of US with a different opinion. Think about what your $$'s supporting. Do I really want to support the company selling cheap coffee when I know it's cheap because they're exploiting workers, spreading poisons on the land and destroying habitat for the migratory song birds that will brighten my day come spring? Or am I willing to spend a few extra pennies so the workers are more comfortable and the birds come back? Take it from there. Spend your money where it supports what you want to see. Re: Re: Blue Voters Now Urged to Buy Blue
by
elle
on Mon 03 Jan 2005 09:54 AM CST | Profile | Permanent Link
I agree about supporting the "little guy". First STOP supporting Wal-Mart. Then start looking at who you can buy those items from that are close to home.
|
Recent Comments
Recent Entries
Logged-In Visitors
Ste - Jan 8, 04:08AM
Mary MacElveen - Jan 1, 01:11AM
Jackson - Dec 30, 01:41AM
Radio Left - Dec 29, 11:03AM
Rana - Dec 25, 12:50AM
parker12 - Dec 24, 12:12PM
timada - Dec 22, 06:14PM
sathyan - Dec 21, 10:24PM
Tia - Dec 19, 12:05AM
Christina - Dec 18, 08:45AM
|
|||||||
|
||||||||


